The science we build on
LVRS FRVR is built on three decades of peer-reviewed relationship research. The most rigorous modern study on what predicts a strong relationship was published in 2020. It identified five factors. We track all five. Every day.
Joel and her co-authors analyzed 43 longitudinal datasets covering 11,196 couples. These five factors explained the most variance in relationship quality. Source listed below.
Whether you feel your partner is in this with you for the long haul.
What we built for it
Pulse score
Your daily Pulse tracks the quiet signals of commitment, not just the loud ones.
How often each of you feels seen and valued by the other.
What we built for it
Tiny Reaches and shared sparks
Small daily moments compound. We make them visible so they do not slip past.
How connected you feel to each other physically and emotionally.
What we built for it
Daily ritual prompts
Gentle, private check-ins that surface drift before it becomes distance.
Whether you sense your partner is happy in the relationship.
What we built for it
Combined Pulse and asymmetry alerts
When one partner pulls away, we flag it early and together. No surprises.
How quickly the two of you come back after a hard moment.
What we built for it
Repair Velocity
We measure how fast you reconnect, not whether you fight. Speed matters.
Source: Joel et al. (2020). Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(32), 19061-19071.
Three decades of converging evidence. The science is not new. The daily practice is.
Predicted divorce with 93.6% accuracy from observed communication patterns. The foundation paper.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Replicated and extended the Gottman framework with modern ML algorithms. Reached 97.6% accuracy across 170 couples.
International Journal of Innovative Studies in Sciences and Engineering Technology.
Used machine learning across 43 longitudinal datasets and 11,196 couples to identify the most robust predictors of relationship quality. Published in PNAS, the most prestigious general-science journal in the United States.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(32), 19061-19071.
Found that the majority of divorces happen in low-distress marriages. Couples who described things as fine often drift quietly until separation. Drift hides in plain sight.
Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3).
We are not licensed counselors. We are an instrumentation layer. If you are in crisis, please find a human.
Statistical patterns describe groups, not your specific relationship. The research is a map, not a forecast.
A low Pulse does not mean you are doomed. It means there is something to talk about, with care.
Joel and her team explained roughly 45% of the variance in relationship quality from these five factors. That leaves 55% unexplained. Some of that is noise. Some is the part of human connection that no model has yet captured.
Self-report has biases. People answer how they wish they felt, not always how they actually feel. We design our daily ritual to be short, gentle, and repeated. Repeated honest signals beat single perfect ones.
No study can predict your specific relationship. The science is a starting point. The daily practice is yours to build.
The Drift Check is free. No signup needed. The science behind it is on this page.
Take the Free Drift Check